The Usefulness of Sub-Cultural Theories in Understanding Crime and Devi

I am going to be assessing the usefulness of substitute heathenish theories in understanding crime and deviance. The functionalist suggested that understanding deviance lies in the studying it function for society rather than the individual itself. Also consensus is infixed for society to function. All functionalist therefore argues that forms of social control ar requirement to check deviant and to maintain social order. Merton theory of anomie is ground on the ideas of the functionalist. Anomie encourages deviance. Merton understood crime and deviance to be a response to the unfitness to achieve social goals. This is often referred to as a strain theory of crime, since Merton highlighted a tension or strains between the cultural goals of a society and the legitimate or institutionalised means of achieving these goals. Merton represent can be seen to be the influence by the American pipe dream provided that you work hard in a good job, money a good house and a luxurious lifestyle can be yours. However he said that when the values or culture goals are internalised, many people dont live up to it or achieve it. Merton presents five modes of adapting to strain caused by the restricted access to socially approved goals and means. He did not mean that everyone who was denied access to societys goals became deviant. Rather the response, or modes of adaptation, depends on the individuals attitudes toward cultural goals and the institutional means to attain them. Conformity is the or so common mode of adaptation. Individuals accept both the goals as thoroughly as the prescribed means for achieving those goals. Conformists will accept, though n... ... of society because of their position in the social structure normally a partition position. Cohen argues that although groups of working class youths may originally accept the wider social goals, their growing awareness of their inability to achie ve goals leads to the development of status frustration, where the goals are rejected. Instead, new and deviant goals are formed and a delinquent subculture is formed. Cloward and Ohlin take these ideas further. They contend that as well a legitimate opportunities varying for the successful achievement of wider social goals. illegitimate opportunities also differ. Thus, some young people are able to link a local gang or to take up a life of crime, but others lack even these choices. These individuals become double failureand usually retreat to a life of violence, drug abuse etc.